Terry Ryan :: Activity :: Inbox | People: | Everyone | Friends & Community | Inbox | Just Me |
| Display: | Full-text | Summary |
| Include: | Blog Posts | Blog Comments | Files | Wiki Page | Wiki Comments |
| << Older | Page 1 of 2 |
With regards to the work of group 4, that is to say, the in-depth profiling of CGU professors, I believe that we will certainly need to use a biographical approach. The biographical approach will allow us to explore different aspects of these professors' lives and their experiences. The biographical approach will make the profiling more vibrant than mere curriculum vitae listing of their educational background, work experiences, publications and research interests etc, since it will emphasize these professors' personalities, ideas and all the personal factors that affect the way they undertake research and make valuable contributions to academia.
It appears to me that the overall objective of the project, in terms of describing and analyzing how CGU professors attain research insights, bestows upon it the case study genre. The fact tha we are researching a particular empirical phenomenon within a specific context makes it a case study.
I also wanted to note some skepticism I have with regards to Creswell's designation of case studies as a qualitative research tradition. First of all, case studies can be based on both qualitiative and quantitiative research techniques. For example, in undertaking a case study of politics in Iraq after the Saddam regime, I am referring to a specific phenomenon within a specific context, hence it's a case study. However, my research may include analysis of quantitative data such as the number of casualities, or the amount of popular participation in elections, so it's not just qualitative in orientation. Secondly, I also think that other qualitiative research methods such as biographies and ethnographies, for example, may also qualify as case studies. If I am profiling the life of Albert Einstein, for example, wouldn't this also qualify as a case study?
I agree 100% with you ask about the future of some WordPerfect, and I also ask, would have occurred with FoxPro if Microsoft not to have bought "FoxSoftware".
Hey All,
I believe this final project will be quite a challenge for such a large group. As mentioned in a number of comments already, the key will be to establish clear subgroup objectives. However, these objectives will need to be communicated amongst other groups so integration will actually work.
It was in Matthew Chapter 6, verse 3 that states, ‘let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth,” but when has the Bible ever solved any ‘real world’ problems. The key to project success will be communication and feedback from other groups. For example, I am on the group for individual profiles, but I would also like to comment on and provide input (where I can) in the other areas of our project. Cause if I don’t, I’ll be very sad.
Nevertheless, this approach assures that each individual is afforded the opportunity to interview a person in his or her department for insight into how that person gains insight (if at all). But this project is also has a chance to give back to the CGU community what we have taken in this past semester. And in the end, the project has the opportunity to shed light on insight around CGU. This is something I do not believe has happened in T-courses of the past.
| << Older | Page 1 of 2 |