Log on:
Powered by Elgg

IS362 Spring 2007 :: Blog :: Neuman Chapter 13

April 14, 2007

Based on the papers we have read, I think conducting any study (case study, field study…) in a systematic, skeptical, and ethical study is both a form of science and art. Although there is no complicated statistics in the field study, a researcher who intends to use this method should have “a strong sense of self, an incredible ability to listen and absorb details, tremendous patience, sensitivity and empathy for others, superb social skills…” Therefore, I do not think that field study is proper for every researcher.

 

According to Neuman, “field research is valuable for micro-level or small-group face-to-face interaction and it is less effective when the concern is macro-level processes and social structures”. In this context, I wonder to what extent field study is applied in our discipline. For instance, is it possible to link ethnographic study to case study or perhaps to grounded theory when conducting IS research?

Posted by IS362 Spring 2007 - Evren Eryilmaz


Comments

  1. Good point Evren.  Although rare but not impossible.  A book named "The Soul Of A New Machine" by Tracy Kidder may be interpreted as ethnography or a case study or both.  The author virtually lived there with these guys who were developing a computer.  Kidder reported on every small aspect and wrote the book as a narrative, which made for an interesting read.  I also agree that this type of research is not for everybody.  It requires more resources and skills to do.

    Nimer AlrushiedatNimer on Sunday, 15 April 2007, 10:52 Pacific Daylight Time # |

  2. Neuman includes a quote in this chapter that "The price of fieldwork is very high, not in dollars, but in physical and mental effort"  An interesting statement that clearly may separate the researchers willing to invest a very specific (and rigorous) amount of time and resources.

    JillJill on Monday, 16 April 2007, 15:29 Pacific Daylight Time # |

You must be logged in to post a comment.